Determinan Variabel Kepuasan Kerja, Komitmen Organisasi, Kinerja Karyawan sebagai Kontributor Perilaku dan Kinerja Organisasi Berbasis Keunggulan Bersaing
Keywords:
job satisfaction, organizational commitment, individual performance, organizational culture, organizational behavior, organizational performance, competitive advantage, human resourcesAbstract
Organizational behavior and performance based on competitive advantage describes all organizational activities and individuals and groups as members with active involvement and trying to realize the vision, mission and goals of the organization by behaving according to organizational culture and achieving better work results compared to other organizations. Organizations with both a profit and not-for-profit orientation consist of a group of individuals and work together in a structured and integrated way that strives for certain achievements. The achievement is in the form of individual performance, group performance, and organizational performance. Every member of the organization carries out daily activities with diversity in behavior but uniformity must be based on the organizational culture. Organizational culture is a complex, abstract, broad and growing way of life-oriented harmony that should be shared by members of the organization because it is formed based on the journey and history of the organization. This culture serves as a coherent framework for organizing one's activities and directing behavior. Organizational culture has a very strategic role in the success of an organization in view of the extent to which culture affects organizational effectiveness. The gap in organizational culture and organizational vision will cause obstacles, disturbances, and problems during activities in the organization. Organizational efforts to achieve goals require three achievements that come from individual contributions, namely job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and individual performance. The three achievements will determine the behavior and performance of the organization. This study aims to identify the determinants and indicators that make up the three variables, namely job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and individual performance. The indicators of the three dependent variables were sorted by factorial analysis. In addition, several determinant variables were found to make a significant contribution to the formation of the three variables. The findings in this study are a contribution in providing an overview of realizing organizational goals through efficiency and effectiveness in improving the quality of human resources.
References
Ackerman, P. L. 1988. Determinants of Individual Differences during Skill Acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 177, 288–318.
Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
Aupperle, K.E., W. Acar, & D.E. Booth. 1986. An Empirical Critique of in Search of Excellence: How excellent are the excellent companies? Journal of Management, 12, 499-512.
Baum, J.R., & S. Wally. 2003. Strategic Decision Speed and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1107-1130.
Boulding, W. 1990. Unobservable Effects and Business Performance: Do fixed effects matter? Marketing Science, 9, 88-91.
Cameron, K., & D. Whetten. 1983. Organizational Effectiveness: One model or several? In K. Cameron & D. Whetten (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple methods: 1-24. New York, Academic Press.
Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Zinta, S. B. 2003. The Relationship of Emotional Exhaustion to Work Attitudes, Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 160-169.
Cropanzano, R., James, K., & Konovsky, M.A. 1993. Dispositional Affectivity as a Predictor of Work Attitudes and Job Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 595-606.
Cascio, W. F. 1997. Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Davis, P.S., & T.L. Pett. 2002. Measuring Organizational Efficiency and Effectiveness. Journal of Management Research, 2, 87-98.
Gatewood, R. D., & Feild, H. S. 2001. Human Resource Selection. New York: Harcourt College Publishers.
Gavin, J. F. (1975). Employee Perceptions of the Work Environment and Mental Health: A suggestive study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 6, 217-234
Guthrie, J. 2001. High-involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 180-190.
Ittner, C.D., & Larcker, D.F. 1998. Innovations in performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 205-238
Judge, T.A., & Watanabe, S. 1993. Another Look at the Job-Satisfaction—Life Satisfaction Relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 939-948.
Kirby, J. 2005. Toward a Theory of High Performance. Harvard Business Review, 83, 30-39.
Landy, F. J., Farr, J. L. 1980. Performance Rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72-107.
Laitinen, E.K., & Chong, G. 2006. How do Small Companies Measure their Performance? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4, 49-68.
Lebans, M., & K. Euske. 2006. A Conceptual and Operational Delineation of Performance, Business Performance Measurement, Cambridge University Press.
Lenz, R.T. 1981. Determinants of Organizational Performance: An Interdisciplinary Review. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 131-154.
Levenson, A.R., Van der Stede, W.A., & Cohen, S.G. 2006. Measuring the Relationship between Managerial Competencies and Performance. Journal of Management, 32, 360-380.
Luthans, F. 2002. Positive Organizational Behavior: Developing and Managing Psychological Strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57-72.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B., Avey, J., & Norman, S. 2007. Psychological Capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60:541-572.
McCloy, R. A., Campbell, J. P., Cudeck, R. 1994. A Confirmatory Test of a Model of Performance Determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 493-505.
March, J.G., & Sutton, R.I. 1997. Organizational Performance as a dependent variable. Organization Science, 8, 698-706.
Mathieu, J.E., & Zajac, D.M. 1990. A Review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
McGahan, A.M. 2004. How industries evolve: Principles for Achieving and Sustaining Superior Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
McGuire, J.B., Schneeweis, T., & Branch, B. 1990. Perceptions of Firm Quality: A cause or result of firm performance. Journal of Management, 16, 167-180.
Meyer, J. P., & N.J. Allen. 1997. Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks. Sage Publication.
Mezias, J.M., & Starbuck, W.H. 2003. Studying the Accuracy of Managers' Perceptions: A research odyssey. British Journal of Management, 14, 3-17.
Murphy, K. R. 1989. Is the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Job Performance Stable Over Time? Human Performance, 2, 183–200.
Neely, A., & Bourne, M. 2000. Why Measurement Initiatives Fail. Measuring Business Excellence, 4, 3-6.
Oldham, G., & Hackman, J. 1980. Work Design in the Organizational Context. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, 247-278.
Ployhart, R. E., & Hakel, M. D. 1998. The Substantive Nature of Performance Variability: Predicting Interindividual Differences in Intraindividual Performance. Personnel Psychology, 51, 859–901.
Porter L. W., R. M. Steers, R.T. Mowday & P.V. Boulian. 1974. Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
Powell, T. 2003. Varieties of Competitive parity. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 61-86
Ramanujam, V., & Venkatraman, N. 1988. Excellence, Planning and Performance. Interfaces, 18, 23-31.
Richard P.J., T.M. Devinney, G.S. Yip, & G. Johnson. 2009. Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718-804.
Riketta, M. 2002. Attitudinal Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 257-266.
Roberts, P.W., & Dowling, G.R. 2002. Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077-1094.
Rosenzweig, P. 2007. Misunderstanding the Nature of Company Performance: The halo effect and other business delusions. California Management Review, 49, 6-20.
Terborg, J.R. 1981. Interactional Psychology and Research on Human Behavior in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 6, 569-576
Tesluk, P.E., & Jacobs, R.R. 1998. Toward an Integrated Model of Work Experience. Personnel Psychology, 51, 312-355.
Thanassoulis, E. 1993. A Comparison of Regression Analysis and data Envelopment Approaches as alternative Methods of Performance Assessment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 1129-1144.
Tsang., Eric W.K., Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: A Dichotomy Between Descriptive and Prescriptive Research, Human Relations, Vol. 50, No. 1, 1997, pp. 73–89.
Van Scotter, J. R., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. 2000. Effects of Task Performance and Contextual Performance on Systematic Rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526–535.
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., Schmidt, F. L. 1996. Comparative Analysis of the Reliability of Job Performance Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574.
Waldman, D. A., & Avolio, B. J. 1986. A Meta-analysis of Age Differences in job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 33–38.
Wright, T.A. 1997. Time Revisited in Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 201-204
Webb, E. & Weick, K. E. 1979. Unobtrusive Measures in Organizational Theory: A reminder. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 650-659
Weick, K.E. 1979. Cognitive Processes in Organizations. In B.M. Staw (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior: 41-74. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
